More Hit Than Miss
The ISTE's Essential Conditions:http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students/nets-for-students-essential-conditions
This was the only technology plan I could find for Franklin Central Supervisory Union:
http://www.fcsuvt.org/assets/files/pdfs/FCSU%20TECH%20PLAN%2009-12%20FINAL.pdf
Here are the four major overarching goals from the tech plan:
- Local Goal: Our SU will utilize technology to support the development of 21st Century skills in students and teachers.
- Local Goal: Our SU administrators will foster the development of teacher and student leaders for student centered learning through technology.
- Local Goal: Our SU will use technology to provide robust and rigorous educational opportunities to students and provide resources in ways that allow for varied access during and beyond the traditional school day.
- Local Goal: Our SU will use technology tools to develop collaborative relationships within the local, regional, state, and global communities.
Indicators of success for each goal are also provided.
The Assessment and Evaluation element of ISTE's Essential Conditions is lacking in the SU's Tech Plan. There is a one-sentence descriptor at the conclusion of the tech plan that is loosely defined and is not implemented effectively. There is no model for either criteria, and teachers are not asked for any accountability with respect to the use of information technology in their teaching practices. I would suggest that teachers be observed a couple of times per year by "skilled personnel" with the use of ICT in the classroom so that progress, or a lack thereof, can be monitored and the school's Innovation Team can get a clearer picture of what information technologies are being used and which faculty members would benefit most from professional development opportunities, peer collaboration during the academic day, and direct the focus of in-service days dedicated to empowering more teachers with the use of educational technology.
The areas of the tech plan that faithfully honor the ISTE's Essential Conditions are as follows. Student-centered learning is paramount to the academic success of our pupils, and the school's tech plan is not without ample opportunities to learn about teaching with technology. The six descriptors under student-centered learning through technology are all implemented and frequently subjects of discussion during collaboration time, faculty meetings, and during in-service days. The indicators of success also articulate the fact that the school is data driven and bases decisions around quantitative evidence collected via electronic platforms (ex. VCAT, PowerSchool, NECAP results, Measured Progress).
A second area that, for the most part, is consistent with the ISTE's Essential Conditions is in the field of Ongoing Professional Learning. The school has been innovative during faculty in-service with the digital "festival of learning". Skilled personnel have facilitated seminars surrounding teaching with technology, and there are always graduate-level courses and workshops offered throughout the school year and the summer (Vita-Learn, Google Tools for Schools, iPad trainings, Champlain College Tech Integration Summer Institute, Ed. Tech sequence at UVM). I am not sure that there is "dedicated time" to learn more about educational technology, since it is not mandated, but for the most part, the faculty desire to become more technologically efficient and demonstrate an authentic willingness to learn on a year-over-year basis.
Using Essential Conditions for Technology Planning
In the area of curriculum framework, preparation for the transition to the Common Core State Standards has dominated the teaching landscape over the past year. A digitized scope and sequence for the curriculum needs to be aligned with Vermont's Technology Grade Expectations and the Common Core State Standards that specifically address the use of information technologies. During collaboration times, which are held twice a week in the mornings before students arrive on campus, faculty need to expedite the process and not have these meeting times veiled as department meetings. More collaboration time (every other week, for example) should become solely dedicated to digitized curriculum mapping. The good news is that this element of tech planning is free; there are many curriculum mapping applications at one's disposal to honor this Essential Condition at no cost.
Another Essential Condition that requires further consideration is the employment of Empowered Leaders. Within the school's administration, the principal held his position for two years, the assistant principal and curriculum director lasted one year, and the superintendent of schools was summarily dismissed from his position as a result of his lack of leadership, though not necessarily a lack of vision for the school. As the Heath brothers state in Switch, "the Rider can't get his way by force for very long" (17). So, while I can appreciate the fact that administrator turnover is about 30% year-over-year in Vermont, hiring committees and the school board would be wise to probe deeply into the intentions of prospective hires and their vision for 21st century learning for the district's schools. Sticking around to see the technology initiatives come to fruition wouldn't be unhelpful with respect to effective and sustained vision for technology planning. Stakeholders at different levels have been catalysts for change, but they have used the school as a stepping stone to other professional pursuits, and that has a negative affect on technology planning when the key leaders are moving through revolving doors within my organization. This does, however, open the doors to searching for exemplars of technology plans from other schools that can provide some guidance for the district's future technology plans. School leaders and skilled personnel can look beyond their own school leaders and stakeholders in the event that they leave to pursue other professional endeavors.